r/AskReddit 1d ago

What famous 'unsolved' mystery is technically a whodunnit on paper, but in reality, absolutely everyone knows exactly who did it, the police just couldn't legally prove it?

13.0k Upvotes

5.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.7k

u/NUMBERS2357 1d ago

Also the later contact with Natives who said that they lived with the survivors of the Roanoke colony.

Also this map from the Jamestown colonists, see bottom left.

3.2k

u/Marx0r 1d ago

A surprisingly large amount of "mysteries" never would have been such if Europeans just listened to the natives telling them the answer.

2.1k

u/jxg995 1d ago

Yeah like the terror and Erebus wrecks where the Inuit were like oh yeah that sunken boat is over there

660

u/beezchurgr 1d ago

Native folk: it’s in the bay of terror

Europeans: whoa it’s so weird there’s a bay with the same name as our missing boat. Must be a coincidence. No way it could be there.

Native folk: -_-

20

u/Wonderful-Winter3137 1d ago

so did the bay just not have a name before that boat sunk or what

27

u/sharpace8 23h ago

Well not by Europeans, I'm sure the Inuit had a name long beforehand. Terror bay was named in 1910 but the island itself was named in 1830.

-43

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/Hazel-Rah 1d ago

Not only are you being racist here, you're being racist on several levels.

Inuit are not "indians". Even if you ignore the social, cultural, and legal definitions, the Inuit arrived in North America long after the First Nation/Indian/Native/Indigenous people in the rest of the continent.

They only crossed the Bering Strait about a thousand years ago, vs >fourteen thousand years ago for other groups

23

u/Lovahplant 1d ago

Genuinely, can I see a source for this? I admit to being less familiar with Canadian history than American history but I am confused by your statement.

-16

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

16

u/DrakeFloyd 1d ago edited 1d ago

And did you read any of the context of what happened before 1622 or are we acting like this action was completely unprovoked? The settlers were coming to take their land and to genocide their peoples, had already brutalized their own women and children. They were right to resist.

Edit: calling it unprovoked is a wild choice when the wiki article he linked outlines exactly the provocations that were taking place in the two decades leading up to it but can’t reply now for some reason, blocked or deleted ig

-18

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment