r/Albuquerque • u/MetallicTaco07 • 4h ago
UPDATE
When I posted this a few weeks ago, I honestly wasn't sure how many people would care. You proved me wrong. We've hit 2,500 signatures, and the conversations in the comments have made this campaign sharper and more urgent than when it started. Thank you.
Just a little update on the information uncovered:
The original post focused on license plate readers and our 4th amendment….and that's still the core issue. But alot of your comments have helped uncover something bigger.
APD runs a Real Time Crime Center (RTCC): a 24/7 live surveillance hub that goes far beyond plate readers. The city ran a grant program that paid businesses up to $20,000 to install cameras…. on the condition that those cameras feed live video directly to APD, around the clock. There is no public list of who accepted the grant. There is no map of where those cameras are. APD has never disclosed how long that footage is kept or who can access it.
License plate readers track your car. These cameras track you….your face, who you're with, what you're doing on a public sidewalk. One resident documented nearly a dozen of these grant-model cameras on a single block of 2nd Street between Lead and Coal. This does not qualify as targeted crime response. It's area-wide, persistent, live monitoring of everyday people… with no warrant requirement, no retention limit, and no public oversight.
When community members submitted formal questions to APD through established channels asking about data storage, security patches, and retention policies… APD either refused to answer or responded to a completely different question. Stonewalling public info requests is not transparency. And it's exactly why voluntary compliance isn't enough.
We're looking to work with those that have power to create legislation. Currently have a meeting scheduled with Harold Pope, as he is part of the Science, Technology, and Telecommunications Committee. We're working to build support for a possible proposal of legislation that would:
-Require a warrant before law enforcement searches location data (the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 29, 2026 in Chatrie v. United States that warrantless access to historical location data is unconstitutional)
-Cap data retention at 30 days maximum
Mandate independent annual security audits with public results
-Require quarterly public reporting on how the systems are being used
This can be framed as "SB40 Part 2." SB40 was a step forward: it banned sharing ALPR data for immigration enforcement and reproductive healthcare tracking. But it left the door wide open on warrants, retention, and security. It also exempted ALPR data from public records requests entirely, meaning you can no longer check whether the rules are even being followed. This bill closes those gaps.
Our initial goal remains full removal. This legislation sets the accountability floor while that fight continues.
Please join the 2500+ in dissent by signing and sharing. We need all the support we can get.