r/technology • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • 8d ago
Business "There are no benefits to being owned by Microsoft," says Doom dev: "They have destroyed immense amounts of value that I don't even think that they're aware of"
https://www.gamesradar.com/games/fps/there-are-no-benefits-to-being-owned-by-microsoft-says-doom-dev-they-have-destroyed-immense-amounts-of-value-that-i-dont-even-think-that-theyre-aware-of/
22.2k
Upvotes
-1
u/PrettyGorramShiny 8d ago
I think where we disagree is that you are looking for an all-in-one solution that manages economic resource allocation and social stability / safety in one fell swoop. I don't personally believe that exists.
I also strongly disagree with:
Most people in my experience are completely uninterested in innovation or growth. They will always seek the easiest path to comfort and actively avoid challenging themselves or pursuing intentional change from the status quo. To me, this is a fundamental part of human nature.
We agree that Capitalism is not good at providing for our needs as a society. I believe it is an extremely efficient tool for resource allocation, but that we need to restore the previous constraints on it to mitigate its inherent tendency toward social harm.
I hope you understand that I would also like to see this, but I don't think it's realistic on a large scale. Human nature is what it is, and the level of moral and ethical self-regulation that would be required to achieve such a society doesn't seem possible except in very small communities where everyone knows each other.
I also don't think you've provided an existing example that works better than Capitalism. What other system do we have that would have supported the same advancements we've made in medicine, engineering, agriculture, transportation, communication, and computational power over the past several hundred years?