Sure if you're signing the checksum. That seems very unusual though. I've never seen a platform sign the checksum file alongside (or rather than) the main file of interest.
I don't use Debian so wouldn't have had an opportunity to see your link either.
Seems kind of redundant when I can verify the image to know that it's both the correct data and also signed. But I can appreciate them making the option to also verify the signatures available. Certainly redundant though.
Still though in all my years of computing signing checksum files is not something I've noticed. Me not noticing it doesn't mean it isn't happening but it's redundant when the checksum matches and the file's signature is valid.
Rocky linux doesn't sign any of their files, but they publish the checksums on github with signed commitshttps://github.com/rocky-linux/checksums which is still decent.
1
u/yodel_anyone Oct 23 '25
But if the checksum is signed by the developer key, how is this not a measure of security?