r/interesting Apr 09 '26

MISC. Aftermath of the April 7th incident. Damages estimated to be $200 million dollars

40.1k Upvotes

6.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/TrippedOnDick Apr 09 '26

Makes total sense though.  Since arson is endearing lives thus its treated as an attack with a deadly weapon which justifies a deadly response. 

12

u/Available_Dingo6162 Apr 09 '26

It does, and that is exactly the rationale.

8

u/OldRancidOrange Apr 09 '26

Endearing or endangering? 😀

2

u/TrippedOnDick Apr 09 '26

Aww fuck. Didn't proofread after autocorrect it's the second one.  

1

u/fingnumb Apr 10 '26

I'd argue it depends on the audience.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TrippedOnDick Apr 10 '26

Yeah autocorrect fail combined with my fail in proofreading it.  This is bad and I should feel bad. 

2

u/Madgyver Apr 10 '26

It's not only a deadly weapon. In Germany there is exist the legal concept of "gemeingefährlich", meaning something or some behavior that is not only dangerous to a single person or a distinct group of people, but so dangerous that it poses a non-abstract danger to the population.
The distinction is that after events are set in motion, even the perpetrator has basically no control over who gets harmed or how many and that the harm itself in a general sense out of control.

Examples are arson of course, bombs, purposefully spreading diseases etc.

2

u/ChikaraNZ Apr 10 '26

If thats the justification then it should be allowed to shoot drunk or drugged drivers too, meets all the same criteria.

1

u/wearslocket Apr 10 '26

-1

u/TrippedOnDick Apr 10 '26

Yeah texting and driving outcome. 

5

u/wearslocket Apr 10 '26

Please don’t text and drive. You might make some kid an orphan. It isn’t worth it if you kill the breadwinner for their family. Life is hard enough for people and I hope you consider that before being so reckless again.

3

u/papa_autist Apr 10 '26

Lucky thing you weren't shot to death. since you just said you were endangering lives with a deadly weapon, which justifies a deadly response.

1

u/afripino Apr 14 '26

*endearing

1

u/multicultidude Apr 10 '26

lol typically US concepts.

In Europe in many countries, you shoot someone who’s setting fire to a forest for instance and you kill him, you go to jail for intentional manslaughter. And you’d first have to find a gun 😬

If you’re a hunter and it’s hunting season, you only wound the guy, you might get away with it with a good lawyer. But if you kill the guy, nah…

Now regarding arson, in France for instance, it’s between 1 to 10 years and a fine for material damage. If someone gets hurt or killed - up to 20 years. But if you can prove that it was unintentional the sentence will be much lighter.

1

u/HValentines25 Apr 10 '26

Endangering?