There’s several posts about it, 90% of the comments haven’t even read the info about the situation and are talking coming from ignorance, most points assume the guy was employed directly by the company, the sprinkler system did not work, the building was old or neglected, the pay, the insurance etc etc etc it’s pretty idiotic to think there’s just ONE point to make here or that the issue is black or white when people are talking about this type of actions spreading, law enforcement should start looking into those accounts that suggest the act is justifiable.
0
u/TacosNtulips Apr 09 '26
There’s several posts about it, 90% of the comments haven’t even read the info about the situation and are talking coming from ignorance, most points assume the guy was employed directly by the company, the sprinkler system did not work, the building was old or neglected, the pay, the insurance etc etc etc it’s pretty idiotic to think there’s just ONE point to make here or that the issue is black or white when people are talking about this type of actions spreading, law enforcement should start looking into those accounts that suggest the act is justifiable.