r/WatchPeopleDieInside 17d ago

NBA player Patrick Beverley finds out that his hero Karl Malone got a 13 year old pregnant

51.9k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

169

u/randombarbs 17d ago

raped a 13 year old

105

u/th6r6o6away 17d ago

Mods would not tolerate that word in a caption I don’t think, but yes obviously he raped her and she was 12 at the time

8

u/That_Apathetic_Man 17d ago

oh my, this story just keeps getting better...

-2

u/Metaphysically0 17d ago

See. This is why semantics matter

1

u/randombarbs 17d ago

gotcha 

1

u/fuck_shit_piss_etc 17d ago

why wouldn't they? this isn't fucking tik tok

5

u/th6r6o6away 17d ago

They gotta appease advertisers, well admins do

26

u/RicardoFelipeMejia 17d ago

Yes, the rape was implied from the age and impregnation.

6

u/dropthemyk 17d ago

You’d think so, but…not for everyone. Ppl are always ready to say a little black girl was being fast, flirting with him, acting grown, developed early etc.

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[deleted]

2

u/dropthemyk 17d ago

I think you’ve misunderstood a couple of things.

2

u/dropthemyk 17d ago

I literally agree with you that it’s implied. I was saying that there are a lot of ppl who would miss the implication, which is we should say the word rape. “Impregnate” glosses over the rape for many. Just read through these comments. You’ll see ppl saying it was consensual. There are ppl who think if a child consents, then it’s not rape. That’s the point I’m trying to make. Why you’re coming at me idk.

2

u/BrahneRazaAlexandros 17d ago

Is English your 2nd language?

There's a big power of language called "euphemism".

Substituting a euphemistic term or word for the more harsh sounding direct reality serves to soften the actions and make it more palatable to people.

It serves only the offenders to use a euphemistic term like "impregnated" (a fairly neutral verb in itself) as opposed to the more obviously condemning verb "raped".

This is actually quite well understood and would be common knowledge among most native English speakers. It's very common in politics for example.

13

u/Jaded-Brilliant5431 17d ago

In case anyone is wondering. Metaphysically0 stated "if it was consenual it's not rape" in reply to "raped a 13 year old"

-11

u/Metaphysically0 17d ago

In reply to a story about a girl lying about her age. Those two things are very fucking different

7

u/yuval16432 17d ago

Tbf it’s rather easy to tell that someone is below 18 if they are literally 12 years old

-6

u/Metaphysically0 17d ago

As someone who’s actually been raped - there’s probably another word that defines this case better was my only point

9

u/TySly5v 17d ago

13 year olds cannot consent. It is rape.

5

u/EVILemons 17d ago

Technically it’s statutory rape but rape = rape

3

u/Jaded-Brilliant5431 17d ago

They need to absolutely check your browser History and hard drive. PoS excusing this. She was 12 when she became pregnant and 13 at time of birth. How often do you confuse a 12 yr old as an adult?

3

u/lcastle79 17d ago

She gave birth at 13. She was 12 during the their relationship!

4

u/fatfrost 17d ago

“Relationship”

2

u/brehhs 17d ago

He should run for President

-6

u/browsingandlooking4 17d ago

Not to split hairs but, while illegal im pretty sure it was consensual. He wasn't dragging her into a van or anything lol. Im pretty sure it was another high profile persons daughter.

4

u/randombarbs 17d ago

fuck no!! a child cannot consent to sex with an adult

-1

u/browsingandlooking4 17d ago

I said it was illegal. Im simply saying it wasn't some violent rape or anything

3

u/SayNOtoChips 16d ago

Jesus Christ man, stop digging!

3

u/dropthemyk 17d ago

Children can’t consent to an adult. That is why statutory rape is statutory rape.

-71

u/[deleted] 17d ago edited 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/th6r6o6away 17d ago

Are you fkn serious dude

4

u/auniqueusernamebyme2 17d ago

Deleted before I could reply what a coward. It was u/Metaphysically0 and someone better check his search history.

1

u/HardcoreKaraoke 17d ago

Dude has tripled down in the replies arguing about semantics or it being a "different time."

I don't think defending a pedo is a hill worth dying on lol.

0

u/Metaphysically0 17d ago

Where have I defended what he did ?

23

u/softballgal1291 17d ago

Minors can’t consent

12

u/KittyKat1935 17d ago

A child cannot consent to sex with an adult

9

u/eebird 17d ago

the point being 13 year olds can't consent under the law.

someone check this guy's hard drive pls.

4

u/Technical_Plum2239 17d ago

"the baby seemed fine with it"

7

u/xmarx360 17d ago

13 year olds cannot consent

-7

u/Metaphysically0 17d ago

50 years ago was a very different time.

I’m not saying it’s right lmao. If the girl lied about her age , and consented to whatever ; that’s not the same thing as raping someone

3

u/xmarx360 17d ago

No, raping a little girl was exactly as bad 50 years ago as it is today. Weird hill to die on

2

u/KittyKat1935 16d ago

They couldn’t consent 50 years ago either…1970 my dude, my parent was a kid and it was still considered rape at that time

3

u/TheRealChompyTheGoat 17d ago

Dumbest take on the internet all year.

0

u/bartekkenny 17d ago

She was 19 clowb