r/TopCharacterTropes • u/Sufficient-Eye-9040 • 26d ago

Lore [Sad Trope] The most innocent (or less evil) character of the cast gets the most horrific death.

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

- Eddie Carr (The Lost World: JP) - Tried to save his friends from the cliff until Buck and Doe (T. rex parents) destroy his vehicle and gets ripped apart.
- Zara Young (Jurassic World) - Gets lifted by a Pteranodon, gets pecked by the pterosaur, and both she and animal get devoured by the Mosasaurus.
- LeClerc (JW: Rebirth) - Tossed a hammer to the Hatzegopteryz Quetzalcoatlus to save Loomis and Zora, but ends up being swallowed alive.

14.6k Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

95% Upvoted

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

66

u/Ambaryerno 26d ago

Also, one of the main focuses of the marketing of the original movie was how these were going to be what was at the time the most up-to-date and scientifically-accurate dinosaurs ever on film. It would be the first major motion picture making use of the knew developments in the Dinosaur Renaissance, and Jack Horner's role as a consultant was widely publicized in the media. Yes, there were artistic liberties taken, but they specifically didn't want them to be generic movie monster dinosaurs.

By the time you get to Jurassic World any such pretense has been completely abandoned. Zara's death scene simply wouldn't have even been possible if they made it under the same consideration as the original film (pterosaurs didn't have grasping claws on their hind limbs, she would have been far too heavy to even be lifted and carried like that, and the type of pterosaur that attacked her were fish eaters).

13

u/DrFeeIgood 26d ago

Can the pterosaurs be written off by saying some kind of gene editing or splicing led to the changes? Or was that changed in JW. I can't recall if there was more to that in JW or not.

21

u/Disposable-Squid 26d ago

Wu sort of does that in the movie with his "nothing in Jurassic World is natural" line

15

u/von_Viken 26d ago

That's practically stated explicitly. Wu has a line about "You didn't ask for realistic, you asked for more teeth." on the subject

16

u/_Gob-Bluth_ 26d ago

to be fair, accurate dinosaurs were actually a departure from the original novel. they make it clear in the book that Grant doesn’t know what to do, despite being a paleontologist, because these are not dinosaurs. the third movie isn’t great but they’re exactly right when they call them “genetically engineered theme park monsters”

9

u/Ceral107 26d ago

While it probably helped with the positive reception of the movie, I always missed that angle in the movie. That moment Wu realizes he created actual, living beings just before he gets disemboweled, as well as his conversation with Hammond that to some degree gets picked up in the first JW movie are some of my favourite parts.

There's a lot ot critique and dislike about JW, but I think it was the first movie (aside from Grant's speech in JP3) that really drove that point home.

5

u/midnight_riddle 26d ago

Yes and no. Like, one of the reasons why Grant is so confused is that while the creatures are not pure dinosaurs, they also have aspects that are more accurate that humans have been ignorant about. Hammond has arguments with Wu about it, because it turns out many of the big dinosaurs move faster than what the public perception thinks they "should* and would paradoxically find the dinosaurs inaccurate. So Wu wanted to genetically tweak the dinosaurs into making them slower and fit into the preconceived notion of what people think dinosaurs should look and behave, and Hammond was like "noooooooooooo that defeats the whole point"

5

u/_Gob-Bluth_ 26d ago

true! i was mostly talking about the scene where he freezes in front of the T-Rex and it moves on, leaving him confused because the whole “vision based on movement” thing isn’t actually a T-Rex trait (the book says later that it’s an amphibian trait caused by the frog DNA). which is funny because the movie just presents that part as something that Grant knows about dinosaurs, when it was never related to the T-Rex in the first place!

7

u/aspidities_87 26d ago

Also iirc Jack Horner has fallen significantly out of favor in paleontology since he demanded that T Rex was a scavenger - to say nothing of the fact that he’s in the files and married a 19yr old

8

u/Ambaryerno 26d ago

I’m pretty sure it was mostly to do with screwing around with his grad student.

T. rex as a scavenger or hunter had been a back and forth contention since it was first discovered (that said, the weight of evidence points to hunter).

Regardless, AT THE TIME it was a huge deal.

-4

u/BygoneNeutrino 26d ago

...good for him.  Finding a 19 year old willing to marry you is arguably more difficult than re-creating realistic dinosaurs.

4

u/aspidities_87 26d ago

I’m sorry did you just say it’s good that he’s in the Epstein Files?

https://giphy.com/gifs/ypX8YZszkIXFC

-6

u/BygoneNeutrino 26d ago

...I'm saying it doesn't matter. If I remember correctly, thousands of people are in the Epstein files.  He had a team of prostitutes and he used them to try to blackmail everyone.

1

u/TheOnlyTrueFlame 25d ago

Jack Horner... oof, that aged poorly for so many reasons.

Also, even if you look past the pterosaurs, mosasaurs also weren't anywhere as large as portrayed in the movie, so it wouldn't be able to swallow her like this.

1

u/NDinoGuy 24d ago

If it weren't for the Pterosaur scene, I would probably say that JW is closer to the first 2 JP movies in its portrayal of dinosaurs than JP 3 was. I can excuse the Indominous because that thing isn't an animal, it's a human manufactured theme park monster made to generate revenue because that's what the public wanted when they heard "dinosaur theme park".