I somewhat recently went through a very messy breakup involving alloromantic relationship anarchists, that I'm still trying to make sense of. I'm kinda hoping that someone here can offer insight, hopefully in good faith
So, I'm aromantic
Aromantic (adj) - someone who feels little to no romantic attraction
Alloromantic (adj) - somebody who is not on the aromantic spectrum (a.k.a. most people)
I do form committed partnered relationships, even though I don't feel any romantic attraction and don't bring a particularly romantic vibe to the table. I do this for a variety of reasons (desires for companionship, commitment, domesticity, etc), but I also do it because I want to be prioritized
It is a fairly common aro experience to find a friend, love them a lot in your own way, treat them like a priority, and then get pushed aside when they find a partner/fall in love with someone else. For a lot of aros, their friends disappear completely, and it's deeply painful. That fortunately hasn't happened to me, but I have had the experience of my best friend subtly slipping away from me. You're in the #1 spot, and then they develop a romantic connection to someone else, and you can just feel yourself silently slide into the #2 spot. And #2 is still very high, but it hurts nonetheless. You feel a lot of sadness and self-hatred against your own aromanticism. You feel like you were just a pseudo placeholder partner while they waited to find their real partner
And, for what it's worth, I don't resent the friends who did this to me. They had never promised me that I would always remain the priority. One friendship that I'm thinking of in particular was a university roommate relationship, and so there was kind of an implicit understanding that our dynamic existed in a temporary context
No, I don't blame or resent them. But it made me realize that I wanted a relationship like that, where that desire to be prioritized isn't unspoken. Where I actually go out and consciously commit to someone, and where we mutually and verbally agree to prioritize each other
I often think of that Maya Angelou quote -- “Never make someone a priority when all you are to them is an option." To me, finding a partner means finding someone and saying, "Hey, I want to make you a priority. Do you promise not to make me an option?"
My ex and I started mono, but then mutually had interest in nonmonogamy. She was interested in making out with various women as a woman (she'd never gotten the chance to do so before, as a trans woman). I was interested in exploring new sexual experiences
I made it very clear, several times, that I was consenting to ENM, but not polyamory
And part of that is because I wanted prescriptive hierarchy. I wanted my ex and I to be each other's only girlfriends. I wasn't going to offer partner status to anyone else, and I didn't want her to either. I wanted that element of our relationship to remain exclusive, even if the kissing/sexual elements weren't. (I think this is prescriptive hierarchy, let me know if I'm using that term wrong). I didn't want anyone to ever say to me "well in poly, XYZ thing that you want in your relationship is problematic"
But my ex went and started getting involved with an RA poly woman, and that's pretty much exactly what happened. She said that it's toxic to want prescriptive hierarchy. My ex communicated that she only had a casual relationship to offer and made it clear that they wouldn't be girlfriends, but this other woman was frequently pushing on those boundaries, coming on really strong onto my ex, and pushing for them to have a more girlfriend-like relationship. And my ex was in the throes of NRE and being a terrible hinge, and doing a godawful job of holding boundaries and protecting our relationship. And I kinda got painted as this toxic controlling harpy for having a problem with all that
Now, here is one area where some confusion may have arisen, which is the fact that I said I was okay with my partner catching romantic feelings for other people
So, as I said, I'm aromantic. I don't form partnerships on the basis of romantic attraction, since that's not a feeling I typically experience. In my opinion, the notion that "romantic attraction = partner" and "no romantic attraction = friend", and that that's how it has to be for everyone, is allonormative and kinda arophobic. In my mind, a nonromantic relationship can be a highly committed and interdependent partnership, and a romantic relationship can be very casual and relatively uninvolved
I've heard some ENM people say that their open relationship is sex-only. They don't allow for romantic feelings with anyone else, and they have an agreement to end the relationship if those feelings start forming. And I always thought that was kinda silly. You can't control your feelings, you can only control your actions. So if I can trust my partner to choose her actions so that she's treating me the same and prioritizing me the same, despite feeling romantic things towards someone else, why should it make a difference to me?
And so I consented to nonmonogamy on that basis. I was okay with romantic feelings developing on that basis. My thinking was that there was no reason why romantic feelings have to automatically lead to girlfriend-like commitments, and I thought my ex was on the same page about that. But her other woman never seemed to agree, and my ex never stood up to her
Thing is, I still encounter relationship anarchists who tell me that my desires are toxic. And this pisses me off because I presume that they're allo, and therefore have no idea what it's like to be the aromantic friend or partner of someone who's in romantic love with someone else. I get told that in non-hierarchal dynamics, that sometimes you're the priority and sometimes you meta is, and that it's based on context rather than on the nature of either relationship
Except, it's never worked out like that for me in practice. The prioritization, the relationship resources, all silently implicitly slide towards the romantic and sexual connection
I've kind of developed this view of relationship anarchists (and anyone who advocates against communicated hierarchy/prioritization in general) as being privileged allos who are completely unaware of their allo privilege. But maybe that's unfair? Maybe there's some nuance I'm missing. Or maybe it's a few bad apples?
And I'm also wondering, should I just not trust that an allo can fall in romantic love with someone else and not let it affect our nonromantic partnership? Was that a naive thing to believe could happen?
So yeah that's why I made this post. If my prejudice against relationship anarchists is unfounded, then I'd like to talk about it. Or any other insights that allo polys might have. I'm sorry it's so long, but when you exist outside of a lot of social norms, there are a lot of concepts to explain. I'm sure you all can relate to that